🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Ban

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. It initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that allowed the commissioner to order platforms to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". The platform even compared the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have met that threshold. As a result, the panel revised the classification of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Opinion

Some on the board held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". They also argued the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released years after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had subsided".

Reactions to the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, X welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator also welcomed the board's decision, but pointed out that the revised classification now means platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator has not issued formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the content were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to use warning labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in line with their own content policies.